delete_webex_space

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states the tool deletes a space (destructive action) and returns a standardized response dictionary. It lacks details on side effects (e.g., memberships, messages), permissions required, or whether the space must be empty. This is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: a one-line purpose, a brief alias note, a structured Args section, and a Returns line. Every sentence adds value, and the structure is front-loaded with the most important information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers the essential aspects: action, synonym clarification, required argument, and return type. It is mostly complete, though it could mention error scenarios or behavior on non-existent spaces.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, meaning the schema only provides the parameter name and title. The description adds 'Space ID to delete (required)', which reiterates the requirement already in the schema and offers minimal extra meaning. It does not specify format, length, or validation rules, so it only marginally compensates for the lack of schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete a Webex space' and notes it is an alias for delete_webex_room, which distinguishes it from the sibling tool delete_webex_room. The verb 'delete' and the resource 'Webex space' are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly explains that this tool is an alias for delete_webex_room and that 'room' and 'space' are synonymous, providing clear guidance on when to use this tool versus its sibling. It also mentions the required argument. However, it does not specify when not to use it or any preconditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.