list_webex_people

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must bear the full burden. It mentions max_results bounds but lacks disclosure of pagination behavior, authentication needs, rate limits, or side effects. The return format is vaguely described as 'standardized response dictionary.'

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with Args and Returns sections, is fairly concise with about 10 lines, and front-loads the purpose. Minor redundancy exists (e.g., 'max_results' default mentioned twice). No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 7 parameters and no output schema, the description covers parameter semantics and mentions return type but omits details like pagination beyond max_results, error handling, or response structure. Adequate but not thorough for a list operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (no descriptions in schema), but the description adds clear, concise explanations for each parameter (e.g., 'Email address to search for'). This compensates significantly, though it lacks advanced details like format constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List people in the organization or search for specific people,' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_webex_memberships by focusing on people rather than memberships or rooms.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for listing or searching people but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., list_webex_memberships). No exclusions or context are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.