list_webex_space_memberships

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions the return type and lists max_results limits, but does not explicitly state the tool is read-only, which is implied but not confirmed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and to the point, starting with the purpose, then a note about the alias, followed by a clear list of parameters and return type. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and four parameters, the description covers the basics but lacks details on parameter interaction (e.g., combining filters) and does not address potential errors or edge cases. The alias note is helpful but incomplete without further context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description explains all four parameters: space_id, person_id, person_email, and max_results (with default and max). It adds context not in the schema, though it omits whether filters can be combined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List memberships for a space or person' with a specific verb and resource. It also clarifies it is an alias for list_webex_memberships, distinguishing it from other list tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes it is an alias for list_webex_memberships, indicating they are interchangeable. However, it does not explicitly state when to prefer this tool over other membership list tools (e.g., list_webex_team_memberships).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.