Skip to main content
Glama
Wagner-Emden-IT-Services

placetel-web-api-mcp-server

List all Webex workspaces

placetel_list_webex_workspaces
Read-onlyIdempotent

List Webex workspaces from Placetel, optionally filtering by display name and choosing markdown or JSON output.

Instructions

List all Webex workspaces. (GET /webex/workspaces) Read-only.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
display_nameNoQuery display_name.
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' (human-readable, default) or 'json' (machine-readable).markdown

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.1

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and destructiveHint=false, so 'Read-only' is largely redundant. The endpoint hint adds minor context, but nothing is said about pagination, result size, or filtering behavior beyond what annotations cover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short clauses, front-loaded with the action. The trailing 'Read-only' duplicates the annotation and could be cut, but the size is otherwise appropriate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter read-only list tool with annotations and no output schema, the description is minimally sufficient but omits the existence of a display_name filter and any return-shape expectations, which an agent would want.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented, giving baseline 3. The description adds nothing about the display_name filter or the response_format choice.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List all Webex workspaces') that unambiguously separates it from placetel_get_webex_workspace and placetel_create_webex_workspace. The endpoint reference adds no ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No statement of when to use this versus the sibling get_webex_workspace for a single workspace, nor any prerequisite. Usage is only inferable from the verb 'List'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools