sch_delete_symbol

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation already provides destructiveHint: true, so the destructive nature is known. The description adds valuable context that directly attached wire segments are also removed, which goes beyond the annotation and clarifies the scope of side effects. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that front-loads the action and object. There is no redundancy or unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple destructive tool, the description covers the main behavior and side effects. However, the missing explanation of the 'reference' parameter and the lack of usage guidance leave the description incomplete. An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one required parameter 'reference' with no description (0% coverage). The tool description does not explain what 'reference' refers to (e.g., a reference designator). Since there is only one parameter and the description does not compensate, this is a significant gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Remove' with a specific resource 'placed symbol' and adds the side effect 'and any directly attached wire segments'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like sch_delete_wire, which only removes wires.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention when not to use it, nor does it reference any related tools. The mention of 'directly attached wire segments' implies deletion of wires might be done separately, but this is not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.