Skip to main content
Glama
TonyBro
by TonyBro

update_game_knowledge

Research and update knowledge about game development best practices and technologies to maintain current expertise.

Instructions

Update knowledge about game development best practices and technologies

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topicsYesTopics to research and update knowledge about

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function for `update_game_knowledge` tool which delegates the logic to `gameTemplateService.updateKnowledge`.
    async updateGameKnowledge(args) {
      try {
        // This would integrate with documentation services
        const updates = await this.gameTemplateService.updateKnowledge(args.topics);
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: `Knowledge updated for topics: ${args.topics.join(', ')}`,
            },
          ],
        };
      } catch (error) {
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: `Error updating knowledge: ${error.message}`,
            },
          ],
        };
      }
    }
  • Tool registration and input schema definition for `update_game_knowledge`.
    {
      name: 'update_game_knowledge',
      description: 'Update knowledge about game development best practices and technologies',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          topics: {
            type: 'array',
            items: {
              type: 'string',
            },
            description: 'Topics to research and update knowledge about',
          },
        },
        required: ['topics'],
      },
    },
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'update knowledge' but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like whether this is a read-only fetch, a write operation to a database, requires authentication, has rate limits, or what the output entails. This is inadequate for a tool with potential mutation implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function without fluff. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, though it could be more specific to improve clarity without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and a vague purpose, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what 'update knowledge' means in practice, the tool's behavior, or expected outcomes. For a tool with potential complexity (updating knowledge implies external data or writes), this leaves significant gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with 'topics' clearly documented as an array of strings for research. The description adds no additional meaning beyond this, such as topic examples or constraints. With high schema coverage, the baseline is 3, as the description doesn't compensate but doesn't detract either.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action ('update knowledge') and domain ('game development best practices and technologies'), which is clear but vague. It doesn't specify what 'update knowledge' entails operationally (e.g., fetching latest info, revising internal docs) or how it differs from siblings like 'create_game_project' or 'get_game_templates', leaving purpose ambiguous beyond a general domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description implies it's for updating knowledge, but it doesn't specify prerequisites, contexts (e.g., after new tech releases), or exclusions (e.g., not for creating projects). With sibling tools present, this lack of differentiation leaves usage unclear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TonyBro/MCP_Game'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server