run_console_command

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations beyond title, so description carries full burden. It discloses queuing and latency, but omits permissions, side effects, or error behavior. For a command execution tool, more detail is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no fluff. Efficiently conveys key info without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks output schema and annotations. Description covers latency and queuing but doesn't specify return value or error handling. Adequate for a single-param tool, but could be improved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must add meaning. It identifies the parameter as a server console command and notes it's queued, but doesn't provide format or examples. Partial compensation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Runs' and the resource 'server console command', including technical details like 'game.ConsoleCommand' and latency. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'run_lua' and 'read_console'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives. It mentions queued behavior and latency but lacks when/why guidance. Usage is implied for running console commands.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.