read_logs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Explains parameter effects (sinceBoot bounds output, errorsOnly returns structured findings) but lacks overall behavior details like output format or pagination. No readOnlyHint annotation, but description implies read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Efficient: one sentence plus three sparse parameter explanations. No filler, all sentences earn their place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers main purpose and all parameters, but lacks usage context against siblings and prerequisites. Adequate for a simple tool but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds full meaning to all 3 parameters: clarifies source enum values, explains boolean flags' effects. Schema documentation coverage was 0%, so description compensates completely.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb+resource: 'Reads the server logs.' Differentiates from siblings like read_entities, read_hooks, etc., which handle different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or alternatives mentioned. Does not guide selection between this and similar tools like read_console.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.