system_resource

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description implies a read-only operation ('Info') but does not explicitly state that it is non-destructive, requires no authentication, or other behavioral traits. For a tool with no parameters, the risk is low, but transparency is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that immediately conveys the purpose and lists key attributes. It is concise, front-loaded, and contains no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description covers the main purpose adequately. It lists the system details that will be returned. However, it could mention that the tool is read-only or safe to call anytime.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so the description does not need to add detail beyond the schema. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate as the description already conveys the output scope.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it provides system information including specific attributes like RouterOS version, CPU, memory, uptime, board, and architecture. This is a specific verb-resource combination that distinguishes it from sibling tools like system_health (health stats) or system_identity (identity only).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention exclusions or preferred contexts. With many sibling tools, a user would benefit from knowing that this tool returns general system info, while others like system_health or system_identity are more targeted.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.