dns_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not state whether the tool is read-only, requires authentication, or has side effects. The term 'Konfigurasi' could imply mutation, but no parameters suggest a read operation—this ambiguity is problematic.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (short phrase), but it lacks sentence structure and is only in Indonesian. It could be organized into a clearer statement with a verb.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description should explain return values or behavior. It lists three configuration aspects but does not describe the output format (e.g., what fields are returned, type of values). The tool is simple but incomplete for an agent to understand what it will receive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description adds value by listing the aspects of DNS configuration (upstream server, cache, allow-remote-requests), hinting at output content beyond the empty schema. Baseline for 0 params is 4 per guidelines.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description indicates the tool is about router DNS configuration covering upstream server, cache, and allow-remote-requests, but lacks a verb (get/set) and does not distinguish from sibling tools like dns_cache or set_dns_servers. The noun 'Konfigurasi' leaves ambiguity about whether it reads or modifies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Among siblings, there are multiple DNS-related tools (e.g., set_dns_servers, dns_cache), but the description provides no context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.