system_identity
Retrieve the system identity or name of a MikroTik RouterOS device to identify and distinguish network routers.
Instructions
Nama/identitas perangkat RouterOS.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the system identity or name of a MikroTik RouterOS device to identify and distinguish network routers.
Nama/identitas perangkat RouterOS.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It states the tool returns the device identity, implying a read operation. However, it does not explicitly state it is read-only or disclose any potential side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, succinct sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no input parameters and no output schema, the description provides the essential information about the tool's purpose. It is minimally sufficient, though it could clarify the return format.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters, the description does not need to add parameter details. The baseline score of 4 applies as no parameter explanation is necessary.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the tool is about the device name/identity, which is clear. However, it lacks a verb like 'get' or 'retrieve', but the resource is clearly identified. It is distinct from the sibling 'set_identity'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when or why to use this tool versus alternatives like 'set_identity'. The description does not specify context or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Syamsuddin/MikroCLAW'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server