Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
MikroCLAW

MikroCLAW

by Syamsuddin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

assign_ip_address

Assign an IP address with CIDR prefix to a network interface on a MikroTik RouterOS device. Requires interface name and IP address.

Instructions

Pasang IP address (CIDR) ke sebuah interface. BUTUH MIKROCLAW_ALLOW_WRITE=true.

Args: address: IP dengan prefix, mis. '192.168.50.1/24'. interface: nama interface, mis. 'bridge1' atau 'ether2'. comment: catatan.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "address": "<address>",
      "interface": "<interface>"
    },
    "name": "assign_ip_address"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
addressYes
commentNoadded-by-mikroclaw
interfaceYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses it is a write operation and needs a permission flag, but lacks details on error handling, overwrite behavior, or validation of inputs. This is insufficient for a configuration-changing tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise: one line for purpose and condition, followed by a bulleted list of parameters. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing important context for a write operation: no mention of return values, error scenarios, or safety warnings. With no output schema and no annotations, the description is incomplete for practical use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds examples for each parameter: address format ('192.168.50.1/24'), interface names ('bridge1' or 'ether2'), and comment as 'catatan'. This adds meaningful context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it assigns an IP address (CIDR) to an interface, with a specific prerequisite ('BUTUH MIKROCLAW_ALLOW_WRITE=true'). The tool name reinforces the purpose, and it is distinct from siblings like 'add_ipv6_address'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly requires the environment variable MIKROCLAW_ALLOW_WRITE=true, indicating when the tool can be used. However, it does not mention when not to use it or compare to alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools