unassign_drp_alerts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description discloses no behavioral traits such as side effects, bulk behavior, permissions, or return format. The example variables are truncated and do not convey behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is not well-structured; it leads with a label and then dumps a long, truncated JSON example. It lacks a clear opening purpose statement and is neither concise nor front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, this description is severely incomplete. It does not state what the operation does, what the filter is for, or what the response looks like, leaving the agent without essential context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, providing descriptions for both 'input' and 'customer_slug'. The description adds a partial example of the input structure, but it is truncated and lacks explanation, so it does not go beyond the schema baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is essentially 'DRP Alerts · mutation unassignDRPAlerts', which restates the tool name as a GraphQL mutation and doesn't explain what the tool does in plain language. It does not distinguish between the sibling 'unassign_drp_alert' (singular) and this plural version.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. The sibling list includes unassign_drp_alert, but the description provides no differentiation or contextual advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.