add_drp_alert_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but discloses nothing about side effects, permissions, or what the mutation actually does. It only labels itself as a mutation, which is already implied by the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, but it sacrifices substance for brevity. The example variable section is useful, but the overall structure is more of a code comment than a tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation with no output schema, the description should clarify what the tool does and what the required input represents. It only provides an example without explaining what the comment is attached to or how the customer_slug header factors in. It is minimally informative.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the schema only describes 'input' as 'GraphQL: DrpAlertCommentInput!' without exposing inner fields. The description's example variables reveal the expected structure (comment, drpAlertBy.id, shortCode), adding meaningful semantic detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description does not explicitly state the tool's purpose (adding a comment to a DRP alert). It only says 'mutation addDrpAlertComment' which is a restatement of the name, and shows example variables. The example hints at the functionality but lacks a clear verb+resource description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like bulk_add_drp_alert_comment, update_drp_alert_comment, or delete_drp_alert_comment. No context or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.