delete_drp_alert_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It identifies the operation as a mutation and shows the comment ID parameter, but does not state that the deletion is permanent, irreversible, or any side effects. This is thin for a destructive action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one concise sentence with a category prefix and an example. It front-loads the operation type and gives the exact variable shape without redundant filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter mutation with no output schema, the description is minimally adequate: it identifies the action and gives an example. However, it omits any statement of effect (e.g., permanently deletes the comment) which would be expected when annotations provide no safety information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes both parameters, giving 100% coverage, but the description adds a concrete example showing the nested drpAlertComment ID field inside input. This helps agents construct valid variables beyond what the schema's generic GraphQL type name provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the operation as a mutation deleteDrpAlertComment, clearly indicating it deletes a DRP alert comment. It includes the resource and action, though it largely mirrors the tool name without elaborating on what 'DRP alert comment' means.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_drp_alert_comment or add_drp_alert_comment. The description only states the operation type and example variables, leaving usage context entirely implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.