Create a new Godot scene file in a project by specifying the scene path and optional root node type.
Create a new Godot scene file
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| scenePath | Yes | Path where the scene file will be saved (relative to project) | |
| projectPath | Yes | Path to the Godot project directory | |
| rootNodeType | No | Type of the root node (e.g., Node2D, Node3D) |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.1Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description alone must communicate side effects. It only says 'create' without disclosing whether it overwrites an existing file, what happens on failure, or what the return value is. This is minimal and leaves important behavioral details unknown.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, succinct sentence that conveys the core functionality without extraneous words. It is appropriately sized for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the primary action but lacks details about return values or error behavior, and it does not clarify whether the scene is saved immediately or merely created in memory. Given the simplicity of the operation, it is adequate but not fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema provides descriptions for all three parameters (projectPath, scenePath, rootNodeType), giving full coverage. The tool description itself adds no extra clarity, so it stays at the baseline expected for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('a new Godot scene file'), making the purpose unambiguous. It also implicitly distinguishes itself from siblings like 'save_scene' (which saves an existing scene) and 'add_node' (which adds nodes to a scene).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for creating new scene files but does not explicitly state when to use this over alternatives like save_scene. No exclusions or conditions are given, leaving the agent to infer the appropriate context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.