radarr_list_wanted_cutoff

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds little beyond declaring the existence of two query parameters. It does not describe the response contents, whether pagination is supported, or what 'cutoff' means in this context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two short sentences, but it is under-specified rather than concise. 'List cutoff' is a vague placeholder, and the query params line is just a partial list without context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the niche nature of this tool and the existence of related 'wanted' tools, more context is needed to understand what 'cutoff' means here. The output schema may cover return values, but the description fails to explain the tool's scope, filtering behavior, or purpose relative to siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 5 parameters with no descriptions (0% coverage). The description names sort_key and sort_direction but provides no meaning, accepted values, or interaction with other parameters. It completely omits page, monitored, and page_size.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'List cutoff,' which essentially restates the tool name 'wanted_cutoff' without specifying what resource is being listed or what 'cutoff' refers to. It does not distinguish this from sibling list tools like radarr_list_wanted_missing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as radarr_list_wanted_missing or radarr_list_command. The mention of query params is not usage guidance; it is a partial parameter list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.