radarr_grab_queue_bulk

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds a clear 'WRITE' warning and states it modifies the Radarr instance, which provides context beyond the annotations (readOnlyHint=false). However, it doesn't disclose further behavioral details such as whether grabbing removes the item from the queue, how it affects status, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences) and the first sentence clearly states the core action. The second sentence, while reinforcing the write nature, is somewhat redundant given the annotations, but it doesn't add unnecessary bulk.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a bulk mutation tool with a highly generic body parameter and no parameter documentation. The description fails to explain the request structure, the bulk aspect, or any expected response. Given the tool's complexity and the need for precise input, the description is woefully incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a single 'body' parameter with no description and allows any additional properties. The description gives zero information about what the body should contain—no mention of IDs, format, or required fields. With 0% schema description coverage, the agent is left completely in the dark about how to invoke this tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies a specific action ('Grab the queued item now') and notes it's a write operation. However, the tool name says 'bulk' while the description refers to a singular 'item', creating ambiguity about whether it operates on one or multiple items. It also doesn't distinguish itself from the sibling tool 'radarr_grab_queue_item'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention that this is the bulk counterpart to 'radarr_grab_queue_item' or explain any scenarios where one would be preferred over the other.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.