radarr_get_config_mediamanagement_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation readOnlyHint=true already establishes the read-only nature, which aligns with the description's 'Fetch'. The description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., what happens if the id is not found, or any authorization requirements), but it does not contradict the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately brief, though it could arguably include more useful detail without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple fetch-by-id tool, the description covers the basic operation. However, it lacks context about what 'mediamanagement' refers to, error behavior, and when to choose this over the list variant. The output schema exists but does not compensate for the description's brevity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only says 'by id' without explaining what the id refers to or how to obtain it. The parameter name 'id' is self-referential; the description adds little beyond the schema's property definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Fetch'), resource ('mediamanagement'), and scope ('single by id'). It implicitly distinguishes from sibling list tools like 'radarr_get_config_mediamanagement' which lack the '_by_id' suffix, though it does not name alternatives explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The 'by id' phrasing implies usage when a specific id is known, but no when-not cases or sibling comparisons are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.