Skip to main content
Glama
SShadowS

business-central-mcp

by SShadowS

bc_write_data

Writes field values to an open Business Central page. Supports card headers and line items with row targeting and a staleness guard.

Instructions

Writes one or more field values on an already-open Business Central page. Pass a fields object with caption-name keys and string values. BC validates each field and returns the server-confirmed value, which may differ from input due to formatting, auto-completion, or lookups (e.g., entering a partial customer name resolves to the full match). Requires a pageContextId from bc_open_page.

Fields must be editable -- writing to a read-only field returns an error. Write related fields together in one call (e.g., quantity and unit price), but avoid writing unrelated groups together because BC validation cascades may change dependent fields in unexpected order. Check the returned confirmed values to see what BC actually stored.

For Document page line items (Sales Order lines, Purchase Order lines), specify section: "lines" to write to the lines repeater. Use rowIndex (0-based row position) or bookmark (stable row identifier from bc_read_data results) to target a specific line. Prefer bookmark over rowIndex when rows may have been reordered or inserted since the last read.

Pass expectedStateVersion (from a prior bc_read_data or bc_open_page stateVersion field) to guard against acting on drifted state. If the page has been mutated by async events or a sibling operation since that read, the call is immediately rejected with code STALE_CONTEXT before touching BC. Re-read with bc_read_data to get the current stateVersion, then retry. Omit expectedStateVersion to skip the check.

Do NOT use this for triggering actions like Post, Delete, or Release -- use bc_execute_action instead. Do NOT use this for navigating to records -- use bc_navigate instead.

Examples:

  • Write to Card header: { "pageContextId": "abc", "fields": { "Name": "Contoso Ltd", "Address": "123 Main St" } }

  • Write to Sales Order line: { "pageContextId": "abc", "section": "lines", "rowIndex": 0, "fields": { "Quantity": "5", "Unit Price": "100" } }

  • Write with bookmark targeting: { "pageContextId": "abc", "section": "lines", "bookmark": "XXXX", "fields": { "Description": "Consulting Services" } }

  • Write with staleness guard: { "pageContextId": "abc", "fields": { "Name": "Contoso" }, "expectedStateVersion": 3 }

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fieldsYesKey-value pairs of field caption names and string values to write (e.g., { "Name": "Contoso", "City": "London" }).
sectionNoSection to write to (e.g., "lines" for document line items). Omit for header fields.
bookmarkNoStable row identifier from bc_read_data results. Preferred over rowIndex when rows may be reordered.
rowIndexNo0-based row position in the repeater to write to. Use for line items. Prefer bookmark for stability.
pageContextIdYesPage context ID returned by bc_open_page.
expectedStateVersionNoOpt-in staleness guard. Pass the stateVersion from a prior bc_read_data or bc_open_page response. If the page state has changed since that read (async events or sibling writes mutated it), the call is rejected immediately with code STALE_CONTEXT before touching BC. Omit to skip the check.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but description fully covers behavioral traits: BC validation, server-confirmed values, read-only field errors, cascading updates, and staleness guard with expectedStateVersion.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with clear sections, explicit do/don't, and four relevant examples. Every sentence is informative without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, description explains return value (server-confirmed value) and staleness rejection. Complex tool (6 params, nested objects) is fully covered with usage details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds significant context beyond schema, such as how to use section, rowIndex, bookmark, and expectedStateVersion, plus examples. Baseline 3, increased due to extra guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool writes field values on an already-open BC page, distinguishes from siblings like bc_execute_action and bc_navigate, and includes specific usage cases.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use (write fields) and when not to (actions, navigation), with alternative tools named. Provides guidance on grouping related fields and using bookmark over rowIndex.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SShadowS/business-central-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server