Skip to main content
Glama
SShadowS

business-central-mcp

by SShadowS

bc_open_page

Opens a Business Central page by numeric ID and returns its full state as sections (fields, rows, actions), providing the page context needed for read, write, and action tools.

Instructions

Opens a Business Central page by its numeric page ID and returns its complete state as a list of sections. Each section has a sectionId, kind (header / lines / factbox / subpage / requestPage), caption, and the appropriate content shape. Card-shape sections (most headers, factboxes, requestPages) carry fields[] (and headers also carry actions[]). List-shape sections (lines, list-bodied headers, repeater subpages) carry rows[] and totalRowCount. The header section adapts to its page: it is card-shape on Card pages and list-shape on List pages -- the kind stays "header" either way for path stability. This is the entry point for interactive, page-scoped work -- it returns a pageContextId that the page-scoped tools (bc_read_data, bc_write_data, bc_execute_action, bc_navigate, bc_respond_dialog, bc_close_page, bc_lookup) take as input, plus a stateVersion you can pass as expectedStateVersion to bc_write_data / bc_execute_action to guard against stale state. (bc_query, bc_run_report, bc_search_pages, bc_list_companies, and bc_switch_company do NOT need a pageContextId.) For bulk, read-only data over standard entities, prefer bc_query -- it needs no open page. Use bc_search_pages first if you do not know the page ID for an entity.

Card pages (single-record views like Customer Card=21) return one header (card-shape) plus any FactBox sections attached to the page. List pages (Customer List=22) return a header (list-shape, rows[] populated). Document pages (Sales Order=42) return a header (card-shape), a "lines" list-shape section with the document lines, and any FactBoxes.

Option/enum fields and boolean fields in card-shape sections carry two extra properties: "options" (the allowed choices as [{text, value}]) and "selectedOption" (the currently chosen entry). Always use the "value" string from "options" as the SaveValue payload when writing an enum field -- do NOT guess or invent values. Example: Item Card "Type" field returns options=[{text:"Inventory",value:"0"},{text:"Service",value:"1"},{text:"Non-Inventory",value:"2"}] and selectedOption={text:"Inventory",value:"0"}.

Typical workflow: bc_open_page -> bc_read_data (refresh / filter / paginate a section) -> bc_write_data (edit fields in any section) -> bc_execute_action (post / release / delete) -> bc_close_page. Always call bc_close_page when done. Do NOT call this if the page is already open -- reuse the existing pageContextId. On BC Online the first call opens a local Microsoft sign-in window (password and Authenticator stay in that window; never pass them as tool arguments). Retry after completing sign-in.

Optional bookmark parameter opens a Card page to a specific record. Bookmarks come from list rows in any prior section.

Examples:

  • { "pageId": 22 } opens Customer List. Sections: [{ "sectionId": "header", "kind": "header", "rows": [...], "actions": [...] }] (no fields[] on a list-shape header).

  • { "pageId": 21, "bookmark": "..." } opens Customer Card. Sections include the header card plus FactBoxes (e.g. { "sectionId": "factbox:Customer Statistics", "kind": "factbox", "fields": [...] }).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageIdYesNumeric BC page ID (e.g., 22 for Customer List, 21 for Customer Card). Use bc_search_pages to find IDs.
bookmarkNoOpen the page to a specific record. Bookmarks come from list row results in bc_open_page or bc_read_data.
tenantIdNoBC tenant ID. Defaults to the server-configured tenant. Only needed in multi-tenant deployments.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the return structure (sections, kinds, card vs list shapes), the pageContextId and stateVersion semantics, the sign-in window on BC Online, the need to call bc_close_page, and the enum/options handling with exact usage instructions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is lengthy but dense and well-organized. It front-loads the core purpose, then logically expands into structure, usage guidance, workflow, and examples. Every sentence adds essential context for a complex tool; no fluff or redundancy exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema and the complexity of the tool, the description thoroughly explains the return format (sections with kinds, shapes, and content), the workflow integration, and special cases (Card, List, Document pages). It covers all essential aspects an agent needs to invoke and interpret the results correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already covers all three parameters with descriptions, but the tool description adds extra context: pageId examples, bookmark origin ('Bookmarks come from list rows in any prior section'), and the enum/options handling (though that is not parameter-specific). It reinforces schema info with concrete examples and clarifies the usage of bookmark and pageId.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Opens a Business Central page by its numeric page ID and returns its complete state as a list of sections.' It distinguishes itself from siblings by explicitly contrasting with bc_query for bulk reads and bc_search_pages for finding IDs, and clarifies it is the entry point for interactive page-scoped work.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance: recommends bc_query for bulk read-only, bc_search_pages for finding IDs, and reusing an existing pageContextId instead of reopening. It also lays out the typical workflow sequence and warns against calling when the page is already open.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/SShadowS/business-central-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server