Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
seosiri-biorobotics

seosiri-biorobotics

Official
by SEOSiri-Official
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

fetch_genomic_data

Fetches genomic data by checking local cache first, then querying UniProt API to obtain sequence parameters.

Instructions

Queries sequence parameters. Checks the local SQLite cache first. If not cached, queries the UniProt REST API and saves the result locally.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "gene_id": "<gene_id>"
    },
    "name": "fetch_genomic_data"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
gene_idYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes caching and API fallback behavior, which is useful. However, lacks details on side effects, error handling, or rate limits. No annotations to compensate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each adding value. The main action is front-loaded. Could be slightly more compact but no waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With output schema present and one parameter, description explains caching mechanism well. Minor gap: no mention of error responses or data format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage for 'gene_id'. Description mentions it queries by gene_id but adds no format or validation details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb ('queries') and resource ('sequence parameters'), with additional caching behavior. Distinguishes from siblings, which are unrelated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use for genomic data fetching but provides no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative tool guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools