sei_sugestao_assuntos_documento

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, and the description confirms read-only behavior by stating it 'Lista'. It adds version availability and error handling context, but does not elaborate on potential limitations like pagination or result constraints, which would add further transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three concise sentences, each serving a clear purpose: stating functionality, providing a prerequisite, and noting version/troubleshooting. No unnecessary words or redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has only one required parameter and an output schema exists, the description adequately covers purpose, prerequisite, versioning, and error handling. It is complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter id_serie has no description in the schema (0% coverage), but the description compensates by explaining that it should be obtained from sei_pesquisar_tipos_documento, adding meaningful context beyond the schema's 'Id Serie' title.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool lists subject suggestions for a document type (série), using the verb 'Lista' and specifying the resource 'sugestões de assuntos para um tipo de documento'. It also distinguishes itself from sibling sei_sugestao_assuntos_processo by targeting documentos instead of processos.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit prerequisite: 'Use o id_serie obtido via sei_pesquisar_tipos_documento', guiding the agent on how to obtain the required parameter. It also mentions version availability and a troubleshooting step, but lacks explicit 'when not to use' statements.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.