sei_concluir_bloco_interno

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations which show non-read-only and non-destructive, the description adds minimal behavioral context: only comma-separated IDs and version info. It does not explain side effects, reversibility, or required permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences with no redundancy. Each sentence adds value: purpose+format, version, error fallback.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Very brief description. Lacks details on what the tool returns, prerequisites, common use cases, or how to handle responses. Despite output schema existence, more context would be beneficial for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description adds the comma-separated format for ids_blocos, which compensates. However, it does not specify the type of IDs (e.g., numeric) or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Conclui bloco(s) interno(s)') and distinguishes from sibling tools like sei_concluir_bloco_assinatura by specifying 'interno'. The parameter format is also mentioned.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It only provides an error fallback hint but does not specify prerequisites or comparison with similar tools like sei_concluir_bloco_assinatura.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.