sei_reabrir_bloco_assinatura

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the tool is expected to modify state (reopening). However, the description adds no further behavioral details, such as whether the block becomes available for signing again, what happens to existing signatures, or required permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with only two sentences, and the first sentence immediately states the purpose. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it sacrifices crucial details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the tool having a single parameter and presumably a simple output, the description omits parameter semantics and return value context. The version error note adds minor value, but overall the description is insufficient for an agent to use the tool confidently without prior knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'id_bloco' receives no explanation in the description. Schema coverage is 0%, meaning the agent has no clue what this ID represents or how to obtain it. The description should at least mention it is the ID of the concluded block to reopen.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Reabre' (reopens) and the resource 'bloco de assinatura concluído' (completed signature block), making the purpose immediately obvious. It distinguishes from sibling tools like sei_concluir_bloco_assinatura and sei_excluir_bloco_assinatura.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is given on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or what to do after reopening. The version note is tangential and does not guide tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.