get_file_download_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the basic action, missing important details such as whether the URL expires, required permissions, or if it is a read-only operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence (8 words) with no wasted text. The description is front-loaded and efficiently conveys the essential purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and an output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It does not explain the nature of the pre-signed URL (e.g., temporary, scoped) or any error conditions, leaving gaps for a complete understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'file_id' has no schema description (0% coverage), and the description does not add meaning beyond its name. While 'file_id' is somewhat self-explanatory, no additional context (e.g., format, source) is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action ('get'), the output ('pre-signed download URL'), and the resource ('file'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_file_upload_url' (upload) and 'get_file' (metadata), with 'download' specifying the operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a downloadable link is needed, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'get_file' or 'get_file_preview_info'), nor does it provide exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.