add_files_to_matter_batch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only states it adds files but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as required permissions, error handling, side effects, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no wasted words. The purpose is front-loaded, and the parameter hint is directly in the description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple batch add tool with two string parameters and an existing output schema, the description covers the essential functionality. Minor lack of info on error handling but still reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning for 'files_csv' by indicating it is comma-separated file names, but 'matter_id' receives no additional explanation beyond its name. With schema coverage at 0%, the description only partially compensates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that this tool adds multiple files to a matter in one request, distinguishing it from the sibling 'add_file_to_matter' which likely handles single files.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says 'in one request' implying batch usage versus single-file alternative. However, no explicit 'when not to use' or prerequisite conditions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.