Skip to main content
Glama
RosenAdvertising

smokeball-mcp

by RosenAdvertising
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to smokeball-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • bill4time-mcp

      RosenAdvertising
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Bill4Time providing API coverage for legal billing and time tracking, enabling natural language interaction with clients, projects, time entries, invoices, payments, and more from Claude Desktop.
      59
      1
      MIT

    • Clio Manage MCP

      patrickking67
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects Clio Manage to Claude via OAuth, enabling law firm management tasks like matter lookup, time tracking, billing, calendar, and document retrieval through natural language.
      41
      MIT

    • clio-mcp

      ToddHebebrand
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A standalone MCP server that enables Claude Desktop to manage Clio legal practice matters, documents, billing, and more via ~46 tools, with secure OAuth and audit logging.
      46
      -

    • filevine-mcp

      Advocate-Cloud-Solutions
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Filevine matter management and Lead Docket intake APIs as natural-language-callable tools, enabling legal teams to query, update, and create projects and leads directly from Claude.
      Apache 2.0

    • clio-mcp

      WYRE-AI
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Clio Manage that enables interaction with legal practice data including matters, contacts, activities, communications, tasks, documents, calendar entries, and bills via natural language.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 189 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct entities and actions, but the split between patch/update for matters and leads could confuse an agent. Also, similar verbs like 'remove' vs 'delete' are used interchangeably, though descriptions clarify differences.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools largely follow a verb_noun pattern (create_, get_, list_, update_, delete_), but there are inconsistencies: 'remove_' instead of 'delete_' for tags and relationships, and occasional non-parallel verbs like 'archive_matter' vs 'unarchive_matter'.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 189 tools, the server is excessively large for a typical MCP server. While the domain (legal practice management) is broad, many operations could be consolidated or parameterized. This number overwhelms agents and reduces usability.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool surface covers CRUD for most entities (contacts, matters, tasks, fees, etc.) and includes many auxiliary features (tags, roles, layouts, webhooks). However, there are notable gaps: no search tools for matters or contacts (only list with pagination), and batch operations are limited.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources