delete_plugin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description minimally states the action but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as irreversibility, side effects, or confirmation requirements. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but fails to provide meaningful context beyond the basic operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no superfluous words, making it concise and front-loaded. However, it is perhaps too minimal for the information needed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one required parameter and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what happens after deletion, any constraints, or how the output (which has an output schema) relates to the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter name. It merely restates 'by ID' without explaining the format, scope, or source of the plugin_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'plugin', and specifies the identifier method 'by ID'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'update_plugin' and 'create_plugin' by the verb and resource type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or referral to other tools like 'unsubscribe_from_plugin'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.