List devices
list_devicesList currently connected devices and their actuators to identify hardware available for control.
Instructions
List currently connected devices and their actuators.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
list_devicesList currently connected devices and their actuators to identify hardware available for control.
List currently connected devices and their actuators.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must convey all behavioral traits. It states 'currently connected devices' suggesting a snapshot, but lacks details on caching, side effects, or refresh behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with key information, no wasted words. Highly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple listing tool with no parameters, the description is adequate. It could hint at return format, but the agent can infer a list of devices and actuators.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and the empty schema is fully documented. The description adds no parameter-specific meaning, but none is needed; baseline for 0 params is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'List' and identifies the resource as 'currently connected devices and their actuators,' clearly distinguishing it from siblings like scan_for_devices and actuator control tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for viewing current connections but gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ProjectAILiberation/tactus'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server