Skip to main content
Glama
OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin Contracts MCP Server

Official
by OpenZeppelin

TRON TRC721

tron-trc721

Generate a TRC-721 non-fungible token contract for the TRON Virtual Machine with configurable minting, burning, pausing, and access control. Returns ready-to-use Solidity source code in Markdown.

Instructions

Make a non-fungible token per the TRC-721 standard, targeting the TRON Virtual Machine.

Returns the source code of the generated contract, formatted in a Markdown code block. Does not write to disk.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
infoNoMetadata about the contract and author
nameYesThe name of the contract
votesNoWhether to keep track of individual units for voting in on-chain governance. Voting durations can be expressed as block numbers or timestamps (defaulting to block number if not specified).
accessNoThe type of access control to provision. Ownable is a simple mechanism with a single account authorized for all privileged actions. Roles is a flexible mechanism with a separate role for each privileged action. A role can have many authorized accounts. Managed enables a central contract to define a policy that allows certain callers to access certain functions.
symbolYesThe short symbol for the token
baseUriNoA base uri for the token
burnableNoWhether token holders will be able to destroy their tokens
mintableNoWhether privileged accounts will be able to create more supply or emit more tokens
pausableNoWhether privileged accounts will be able to pause specifically marked functionality. Useful for emergency response.
enumerableNoWhether to allow on-chain enumeration of all tokens or those owned by an account. Increases gas cost of transfers.
uriStorageNoAllows updating token URIs for individual token IDs
incrementalNoWhether new tokens will be automatically assigned an incremental id
upgradeableNoWhether the smart contract is upgradeable. Transparent uses more complex proxy with higher overhead, requires less changes in your contract. Can also be used with beacons. UUPS uses simpler proxy with less overhead, requires including extra code in your contract. Allows flexibility for authorizing upgrades.
namespacePrefixNoThe prefix for ERC-7201 namespace identifiers. It should be derived from the project name or a unique naming convention specific to the project. Used only if the contract includes storage variables and upgradeability is enabled. Default is "myProject".
crossChainBridgingNoWhether to embed an ERC-7786 based bridge directly in the token contract, making it natively crosschain. Crosschain transfers with registered counterparts burn the token on the source chain and mint it on the destination chain. If also using incremental token ids, mint only on a single chain and link counterparts without minting, otherwise colliding ids can strand bridged tokens.
crossChainLinkAllowOverrideNoWhether to allow replacing a crosschain link that has already been registered. Only used if crossChainBridging is set to "erc7786native".
Install Server

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It clearly says the tool returns generated source code in a Markdown code block and does not write to disk, making the pure code-generation behavior explicit. It could also mention no deployment occurs, but the no-write statement substantially covers side-effect transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short paragraphs with no filler: purpose first, then output format and side-effect caveat. Every sentence earns its place, and the key facts 'Returns source code' and 'Does not write to disk' are immediately available.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a code-generation tool with a rich 16-parameter schema, the description covers purpose, output format, and side-effect boundary in two sentences. There is no output schema, but the description compensates by specifying the return format. It does not detail all possible behaviors, but the key invocation-relevant information is present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all parameters already have documented meanings in the schema. The description does not add parameter-level detail, but it clarifies that the output is a generated source code artifact rather than an actual chain deployment. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States explicitly that the tool makes a non-fungible token per the TRC-721 standard on the TRON Virtual Machine. The verb 'Make' plus the resource 'non-fungible token per TRC-721' clearly distinguishes it from siblings such as tron-trc20 and tron-trc1155.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description defines the use case by standard and target platform: it is the tool for TRC-721 non-fungible token contract generation on TRON. It does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it, but the context is clear enough to route correctly among the TRON siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OpenZeppelin/contracts-wizard'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server