OpenZeppelin Contracts MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to OpenZeppelin Contracts MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives autonomous coding agents deterministic, schema-validated tools for EVM smart contract development — security scanning, gas profiling, compiler diagnostics, and transaction simulation.91MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to build and deploy Ethereum applications using Scaffold-ETH.3422 npm2MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI agents to work with GenLayer projects, providing tools to run GenLayer CLI, lint contracts, and deploy contracts with automatic private key handling.47 npm1-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for generating sophisticated GenLayer Intelligent Contracts with AI-native blockchain capabilities.163 npm7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing AI assistants with tools for advanced EVM smart contract analysis, including proxy detection, implementation resolution, and security analysis.1MIT
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that gives LLMs the ability to interact with Ethereum networks, manage wallets, query blockchain data, and execute smart contract operations through a standardized interface.5432 npm14MIT
TDQS
Scored across 33 tools
Most tools are distinguishable by a clear platform prefix plus contract standard, such as solidity-erc20, cairo-erc20, and tron-trc20. However, several similar fungible-token generators exist across ecosystems, and stablecoin/RWA/custom variants can be confused without reading the full descriptions.
The dominant pattern is platform-contractType (for example solidity-erc721, cairo-governor, stellar-vault), which is predictable and readable. A few tools deviate from that prefix pattern, such as uniswap-hooks and confidential-erc7984, and stellar uses standard names like fungible instead of ERC-style names.
The 33-tool surface is heavy for an MCP server and contains many near-duplicate variants across chains and standards. While the domain is broad, the catalog would benefit from grouping or fewer platform-specific tools.
The tool set covers most common smart-contract categories: fungible/non-fungible tokens, governance, accounts, stablecoins, RWAs, vaults, vesting, multisig, and custom contracts. Gaps exist, such as limited Stylus/Tron coverage for some patterns, but the custom-contract tools provide a workaround.