stylus-erc721

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses 'Returns the source code... Does not write to disk', making it clear this is a read-only generation tool. No annotations provided, so description carries the burden and does well, though could mention more about safety or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. Front-loaded with purpose, then behavioral detail. Efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description is adequate for a code generation tool with 4 params and no output schema, but misses context like programming language (Rust for Stylus) and platform specifics. Could be more complete given no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already well-documented. Description adds no extra meaning to parameters beyond stating the return value. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool 'Make a non-fungible token per the ERC-721 standard', using specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from siblings like stylus-erc20 and solidity-erc721 by specifying the standard and platform context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like solidity-erc721 or cairo-erc721. The description does not mention context (Stylus platform) or differentiate from similar ERC721 tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.