Skip to main content
Glama
OpenZeppelin

OpenZeppelin Contracts MCP Server

Official
by OpenZeppelin

solidity-rwa

Generate an ERC-20 token contract for tokenizing real-world assets with customizable features like minting, burning, pausing, and access control.

Instructions

Make a real-world asset token that uses the ERC-20 standard. Experimental, some features are not audited and are subject to change.

Returns the source code of the generated contract, formatted in a Markdown code block. Does not write to disk.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesThe name of the contract
symbolYesThe short symbol for the token
decimalsNoThe number of decimals used to represent token amounts. Defaults to 18.
burnableNoWhether token holders will be able to destroy their tokens
pausableNoWhether privileged accounts will be able to pause specifically marked functionality. Useful for emergency response.
premintNoThe number of tokens to premint for the deployer.
premintChainIdNoThe chain ID of the network on which to premint tokens.
mintableNoWhether privileged accounts will be able to create more supply or emit more tokens
callbackNoWhether to include support for code execution after transfers and approvals on recipient contracts in a single transaction.
permitNoWhether without paying gas, token holders will be able to allow third parties to transfer from their account.
votesNoWhether to keep track of historical balances for voting in on-chain governance. Voting durations can be expressed as block numbers or timestamps.
flashmintNoWhether to include built-in flash loans to allow lending tokens without requiring collateral as long as they're returned in the same transaction.
crossChainBridgingNoWhether to allow authorized bridge contracts to mint and burn tokens for cross-chain transfers. Options are to use custom bridges on any chain, to embed an ERC-7786 based bridge directly in the token contract, or to use the SuperchainERC20 standard with the predeployed SuperchainTokenBridge. The SuperchainERC20 feature is only available on chains in the Superchain, and requires deploying your contract to the same address on every chain in the Superchain.
crossChainLinkAllowOverrideNoWhether to allow replacing a crosschain link that has already been registered. Only used if crossChainBridging is set to "erc7786native".
namespacePrefixNoThe prefix for ERC-7201 namespace identifiers. It should be derived from the project name or a unique naming convention specific to the project. Used only if the contract includes storage variables and upgradeability is enabled. Default is "myProject".
accessNoThe type of access control to provision. Ownable is a simple mechanism with a single account authorized for all privileged actions. Roles is a flexible mechanism with a separate role for each privileged action. A role can have many authorized accounts. Managed enables a central contract to define a policy that allows certain callers to access certain functions.
infoNoMetadata about the contract and author
restrictionsNoWhether to restrict certain users from transferring tokens, either via allowing or blocking them. This feature is experimental, not audited and is subject to change.
freezableNoWhether authorized accounts can freeze and unfreeze accounts for regulatory or security purposes. This feature is experimental, not audited and is subject to change.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It explicitly states that the tool returns source code in a Markdown code block and does not write to disk, providing clarity on output and side effects. It also notes the experimental nature. It could mention more about deployment implications, but it is sufficiently transparent for a code generation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loading the purpose, then adding a warning and output details. Every sentence is informative with no wasted words. It is highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 19 parameters, 2 required, and no output schema, the description is complete enough. The parameter descriptions are rich, and the tool description adds context about the experimental nature and output format. It could summarize the key features unique to RWA tokens, but it is largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage, so each parameter is already documented. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning, meeting the baseline of 3. No extra value is provided beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool makes a real-world asset token using ERC-20, distinguishing it from standard ERC-20 tools like solidity-erc20 by implying additional features (restrictions, freezable, etc.). The verb 'Make' and resource 'real-world asset token' are specific. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from siblings, so it scores 4.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description warns that the tool is experimental and some features are not audited, but it provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., solidity-erc20). No prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned, leaving the agent without clear context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OpenZeppelin/contracts-wizard'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server