list_paideia_actions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral information. It only states the action (list) but does not disclose whether it is read-only, what side effects exist, or what happens if the repo_root is not found. No details about return format or pagination.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence of 12 words. It efficiently conveys the primary purpose without redundancy, though it could include additional useful context without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should explain the return value (list of action names, details, etc.) but does not. Also, with many sibling tools, more context on when to use this tool is needed. The description feels incomplete for a list action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not add any meaning beyond the input schema, which already covers the single optional parameter with a description. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline is 3, and the description does not improve upon it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool lists PAIDEIA actions with the specific context 'available to Alt's local model'. This distinguishes it from other sibling tools that might list or manipulate actions in different contexts, though it doesn't fully differentiate from similar list tools like 'prepare_paideia_action'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'prepare_paideia_action' or 'paideia_doctor'. The description lacks any when-to-use or when-not-to-use instructions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.