bootstrap_alt_course

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden but only mentions the basic action. It does not disclose behaviors like folder overwrite, git initialization, error handling, or what happens if notes already exist. Parameters like 'overwrite_notes' and 'continue_on_error' are not referenced.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that gets to the point. It could be slightly expanded to include important caveats, but it is not verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 12 parameters, 3 required, and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain parameter purposes, return values, or provide context for when to use this complex composite tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 17%, and the tool description adds no parameter explanations. Most parameters lack descriptions in both the schema and the description, leaving the agent to guess their meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a PAIDEIA course folder and imports Alt note transcripts in one call. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'init_course' and 'import_alt_notes' by combining both actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus using 'init_course' and 'import_alt_notes' separately. There are no when-not-to-use tips or alternative suggestions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.