PAIDEIA__save_course_index

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden. It does not disclose side effects, permissions, overwrite behavior (despite an overwrite parameter), error handling, or whether the operation is atomic. Only states it saves to three files in one call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with core purpose. The first sentence is somewhat redundant but not excessive. No fluff, efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters (3 required) and no output schema or annotations, the description leaves gaps: no explanation of overwrite or project_root, no return value. It hints at the output directory but is not fully comprehensive for a save operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (20% only for project_root). The description adds meaning by mapping summary_md, patterns_md, coverage_md to the respective files. Overwrite and project_root are not explained. Baseline 3 is appropriate given partial addition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool saves model-generated analyze outputs to three specific files (summary.md, patterns.md, coverage.md) in one call. The verb 'save' and resource are specific, distinguishing it from sibling tools like build_course_index. However, the first sentence about namespace alias adds redundancy.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only mentions to use the exact name for searches, not the scenario of use. Missing context on prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.