import_alt_notes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It mentions importing into two directories but does not disclose behaviors like overwrite, error handling, or write_converted. Key behavioral traits are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence that directly states what the tool does. No wasted words; efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite concise purpose, the description is incomplete for a tool with 6 parameters and no output schema. It lacks explanation of parameter interactions, default behaviors, and overall workflow. Schema descriptions partially fill the gap but the description should tie them together.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 17% schema description coverage, the description adds some value by specifying source and destination paths, but it does not compensate for the many undocumented parameter semantics (e.g., overwrite, continue_on_error, write_converted).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it batch-imports Alt notes from a specific source (alt.notes.getContent) into two specific target directories (materials/<category> and converted/<category>). This distinguishes it from the singular sibling import_alt_note.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies batch usage but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like import_alt_note. No usage context or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.