update_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but is minimal. It does not disclose that the tool likely updates only the enabled field, or explain the role of optional parameters like env_id and agent_token. Behavioral details beyond the basic action are absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with one phrase. While brevity is positive, it sacrifices necessary detail for a tool with multiple parameters and no output schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and 4 undocumented parameters, the description is insufficiently complete. It does not inform the agent about return values, optional parameter usage, or prerequisites for calling the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate but does not. It adds no meaning beyond the tool's action, leaving parameters like webhook_id, enabled, env_id, and agent_token unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Enable or disable a webhook' clearly states the specific action of toggling the enabled state. It differentiates from sibling tools like create_webhook, delete_webhook, list_webhooks, and trigger_webhook by specifying the exact operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention that it should be used to change only the enabled status, nor does it reference sibling tools for other webhook modifications.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.