unignore_vulnerability

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description carries full burden. It discloses confirmation requirement, but the mention of 'confirmation_token' does not clearly map to 'agent_token' parameter. No info on destructiveness, rollback, or results. Ambiguous and incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise single sentence plus requirement note. No redundancy, but could be structured better with parameter context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to explain how to obtain ignore_id or confirmation token, what the tool returns, or prerequisites. Incomplete for a reversal action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and description only mentions 'confirmation_token' without explaining any of the three parameters (env_id, ignore_id, agent_token). No added meaning over schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action 'un-ignore a previously ignored vulnerability' with specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling 'ignore_vulnerability' and other tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions requirement for confirmation via token but does not specify when to use (e.g., after listing ignored vulnerabilities) or exclude alternatives. Some guidance implied but insufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.