restart_project
Restart a Docker Compose project to apply configuration changes or recover from failures.
Instructions
Restart a Compose project.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| env_id | No | 0 | |
| project_id | Yes | ||
| agent_token | No |
Restart a Docker Compose project to apply configuration changes or recover from failures.
Restart a Compose project.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| env_id | No | 0 | |
| project_id | Yes | ||
| agent_token | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose side effects like volume persistence, required project state, or authorization needs. The minimal description is insufficient for understanding the tool's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise (one sentence) but at the expense of necessary detail. It is appropriately front-loaded but too brief to be effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and parameter descriptions, the tool definition is severely incomplete. It does not cover prerequisites, return values, or operational context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description does not clarify any of the three parameters (project_id, env_id, agent_token). It adds no value beyond the schema definition.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Restart' and the resource 'Compose project', but it does not differentiate from similar sibling tools like restart_container or redeploy_project.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as restart_container or redeploy_project. The description lacks any context for decision-making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MikeCase/arcane-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server