remove_container

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It mentions a confirmation token but does not detail the token source, what happens if missing, or the destructive nature of the operation. Critical information about side effects (e.g., data loss) is absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but critically under-specified; it lacks essential details. It is not sufficiently informative for its length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No annotations or output schema exist. With four parameters and no parameter documentation, the description is grossly incomplete. It omits return information, error conditions, prerequisites, and side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds no meaning to any of the four parameters (force, env_id, agent_token, container_id). The agent cannot infer parameter purpose or constraints from the description alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Remove a container' which is a clear verb and resource, but it does not differentiate from sibling tools like kill_container or stop_container. The term 'remove' could be ambiguous without context, and there is no mention that it is a destructive operation that deletes the container.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as kill_container or stop_container. It mentions a requirement for a confirmation token but does not explain how to obtain it or when it is needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.