Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to carter-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      TouchBridge is a local-first MCP server for iOS simulators and physical devices, enabling AI to see, control, test, and redesign iPhone screens through a structured screenshot bridge and tool surface.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Turns AI coding hosts into a guided mobile-UI design tool with design interviews, token contracts, linters, and local browser preview.
      8
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive a running Roblox Studio in real time over a single WebSocket, executing whole Luau programs, installing in-engine controllers, hot-patching scripts during live playtests, and receiving errors, assertions and other events as pushes. It also reaches Roblox Open Cloud for the open place and answers visual questions via a vision sidecar, exposing all of this through nine MCP tools.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to build and edit app-screen mockups and clickable prototypes by reading and writing structured scene models, including screen creation, node manipulation, and branching from code-based screens.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control iOS simulators through WebDriverAgent, supporting taps, swipes, typing, screenshots, recording, and app actions with a real-time dashboard for visual feedback.
      36
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 57 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes, e.g., multiple ways to add controls (add_control, insert_example, customize_on_phone) and multiple push/save layout functions (push_buffer, push_layout, save_buffer, save_layout). The descriptions help but the high number of similar tools makes it confusing for an agent to select the correct one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., add_control, remove_control, update_control, push_buffer). Minor deviations exist, such as 'autotune_gauge' and 'customize_on_phone', but the overall pattern is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 57 tools, the server has an excessive number for its domain (a layout editor for a device). Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple push/save functions, multiple validation/linting tools). This overpopulation adds unnecessary complexity.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle: layout creation and editing (add, remove, move, update controls), device connection, data probing, validation, generation (adapter, service, theme), testing (simulate, run_scenario), and chat interaction. There are no obvious gaps for the intended purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues