Fl Playlist Tracks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must convey behavioral traits. The verb 'List' strongly implies a read-only operation with no side effects, but it does not explicitly state that no modifications occur or that it is safe. It also does not mention any potential side effects related to 'performance mode' or other aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and to the point, consisting of a single sentence that directly states the purpose and the output fields. There is no redundant information or unnecessary verbosity, making it easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the output fields are listed, the description omits any explanation of the parameters, which are essential for using the tool correctly. It also does not clarify what 'performance mode' refers to or whether the list is ordered. Given the simplicity of the tool, it is still incomplete without parameter details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The parameters max_tracks and only_named are not described in the text. Since schema_description_coverage is 0%, the description must compensate, but it makes no mention of these parameters or their meanings. The parameter names offer some hints but the description itself provides no guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'List' and the object 'playlist tracks', and lists specific properties (name, colour, mute, solo, selected, activity, time selection, performance mode). It distinguishes this tool from others that modify tracks (e.g., fl_playlist_track_set) and is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are many sibling tools (e.g., fl_channels, fl_mixer_tracks) but the description does not clarify what makes this the right choice for listing playlist tracks specifically, nor does it mention any conditions for not using it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.