Fl Notes State

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description alone must clarify behavior. It implies a read operation ('last exported state') but does not explicitly state that it is non-destructive or describe any side effects. 'Pending operations' is vague and could suggest stateful behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using a single sentence to convey the essential content. It is well-structured and free of redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with no parameters, the description is mostly adequate. However, it does not clarify what 'pending operations' refers to or how the returned state is formatted. The presence of an output schema is implied but not elaborated, leaving some ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters, and the empty schema has full coverage. The baseline for no parameters is 4, and the description does not need to explain parameters. It is clear there are no inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a noun phrase 'Last exported piano roll state' rather than a clear verb, but it does convey the resource being accessed. It distinguishes from sibling tools like fl_notes_add and fl_notes_edit by focusing on state, though the distinction is implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention conditions for retrieving state or suggest when to prefer other note-related tools. The context of 'exported' is ambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.