Fl Notes Edit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description only reveals that edits are 'queued'. It does not disclose side effects, ordering behavior, undo interaction, persistence, or the effect of the auto_trigger parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded, with no filler words. The dense DSL syntax packs a lot of information into a small space, though it could benefit from a bit more prose for readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity and the lack of annotations, the description is incomplete. Key parameters and operation details are undefined, and the output schema is not explained, leaving an agent without enough context to reliably construct valid inputs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains the operations grammar and filter fields, but the input schema is generic and almost fully undocumented. The auto_trigger parameter is not described at all, and many terms like props, grid, strength, and lengths are left undefined.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Queue piano roll edits' and enumerates the supported operations, making its purpose explicit and distinguishing it from read-only tools like fl_notes_state or single-purpose tools like fl_notes_add.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as fl_notes_add, fl_notes_marker, or fl_undo. It lists operations but does not explain use cases, conditions, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.