Fl Internal

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

It is implied that this tool only reads internal module information, but side effects are not explicitly stated. No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden but fails to confirm whether it is read-only, safe, or has any hidden effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The text is short and to the point, but the phrasing is cryptic and densely packed with domain-specific shorthand (e.g., 'flrack = add channels/load assets'). It is efficient but sacrifices clarity for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the large set of sibling tools, this description lacks context about what 'internal FL modules' are, how they relate to the controller context, and why an agent would need this information. The tool appears niche, but the description does not provide enough context to determine its place in the overall workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains the two invocation modes: no arguments lists modules, and passing a module (plus optional name) retrieves signature/docstring/members. This adds meaning to the otherwise undocumented 'name' and 'module' parameters, though the exact format and default behavior are still unclear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description hints at inspecting internal FL modules (list imports or get signature/docstring/members) but lacks an explicit verb or clear statement of what is returned. It does not distinguish itself from the many sibling tools, making the purpose somewhat ambiguous for an unfamiliar agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'for use through fl_exec' but does not explain when to use this tool instead of alternatives such as fl_plugin_info or fl_param_scan. There is no guidance on typical scenarios, prerequisites, or how to combine it with other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.