Skip to main content
Glama
LaplaceYoung

ansys-aedt-mcp

by LaplaceYoung

aedt_native_module_call

Invoke methods on any AEDT native module (e.g., from HFSS, Maxwell) by specifying module name, method, and optional arguments for simulation automation.

Instructions

Call a method on an AEDT native module returned by odesign.GetModule(module_name).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
module_nameYes
methodYes
argsNo
kwargsNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, yet the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as destructive nature, error handling, or side effects, leaving the AI agent without critical safety information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it sacrifices essential detail for brevity, making it under-specified for effective use.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite an output schema existing, the description does not hint at return values or structure, and the minimal information leaves significant gaps for a tool with 4 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds no meaning to the parameters. While 'module_name' and 'method' are clear from names, 'args' and 'kwargs' remain ambiguous without further explanation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it calls a method on an AEDT native module, referencing odesign.GetModule, which distinguishes it from more specific sibling tools like aedt_native_get_properties.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like aedt_native_module_batch_call. Only mentions the source of the module, but lacks context for usage decisions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LaplaceYoung/ansys-aedt-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server