aedt_icepak_operation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Run' without indicating side effects, read/write nature, error handling (e.g., if method is not allowlisted), or dependencies. This is insufficient for safe agent usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the primary purpose. It is not overly verbose, though the enumeration of types could be streamlined. Still, it earns its place without unnecessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (3 parameters, many siblings, output schema exists), the description is too minimal. It does not explain valid method values, how to use args/kwargs, or what the output contains. A more complete description is needed for effective tool usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, so the description must compensate. It adds meaning by listing operation types (e.g., 'thermal source'), hinting at valid 'method' values. However, it does not explain 'args' or 'kwargs', leaving their purpose ambiguous. Some added value but incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool 'Run's an allowlisted Icepak operation' and lists specific operation types (thermal source, opening, wall, monitor, fan, or mesh). This helps distinguish from sibling tools like aedt_circuit_operation or aedt_hfss_operation, which are for other disciplines. However, 'allowlisted' is vague without specifying the list, slightly reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention context, prerequisites, or when not to use it. Given the many sibling tools, explicit usage guidance would be valuable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.