aedt_get_traces_for_plot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic purpose. There is no mention of side effects, required permissions, read-only nature, or other contextual factors. Annotations are absent, so the description carries the full burden but provides minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it redundantly includes the function name. It is structured adequately but could be more efficient by omitting the name and adding more useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema (which covers return values), the description fails to provide sufficient context for a tool that interacts with other report tools. It does not explain what 'traces' are, how they relate to plots, or how this tool integrates with siblings like 'aedt_create_report'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema defines a single generic 'kwargs' parameter with no structure or description. The description adds no meaning or constraints; it does not explain what keys or values are expected. With 0% schema description coverage, the parameter is essentially undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns available report traces using the verb 'return' and the resource 'report traces'. It is specific enough, though it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'aedt_get_solution_data' or 'aedt_create_report'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'aedt_get_solution_data' or 'aedt_create_report'. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, integration with other tools, or scenarios where it is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.